Like, desire, while the inhibition from advice off intimate selection

Like, desire, while the inhibition from advice off intimate selection

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you may Human Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.

Cross-sectional analysis off closeness, appeal, and you can commitment: Comparison new assumptions of one’s triangular theory of love

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area regarding attachment inside people mating. Breakdown of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Web sites contradiction reviewed. Record off Social Points, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites contradiction: A personal tech one to minimizes public wedding and mental better-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Industries, J. Yards. (2001). Number, timing, and duration of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Most recent People Records, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Feeling most readily useful about starting bad: Personal reviews inside personal matchmaking. Journal out of Personality and you can Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Journal out of Character and you may Social Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you attractive options: The fresh changed therapy regarding relationship maintenance. Development and Human Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential investigation regarding conflict and you may accord in disappointed and you will nondistressed marital lovers. Record from Asking and you will Logical Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Eco-friendly, An effective. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Matchmaking creation on the internet: What is the larger attraction? Record off Societal Facts, 58(1), 9–30.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The advantages of self-confident illusions: Idealization while the build off fulfillment into the romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and you may Social Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.

Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-investigations intentions within the close dating: A type of globally improvement and particular verification. Into the P. Noller & J. A beneficial. Feeney (Eds.), Knowledge ents throughout the examination of few telecommunications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Intrasexual vigilance: The brand new implicit cognition out-of romantic competition

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-therapist bond from contact lens away from accessory principle. Psychotherapy: Concept, Browse, Practice, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh social keeping track of program: Increased sensitiveness to public cues as an adaptive response to social difference. From inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The new societal outcast: Ostracism, personal exclusion, getting rejected, and you will intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Psychology Push.

Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the world and particular relational models regarding exposure to social affairs. Log out-of Identification and you may Societal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you may advice trying in intimate relationships. Character and you can Societal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and certain connection representations from inside the adulthood: Will there be a romance?. Record Regarding Public And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A good. (2001)mitment and you can dating repair mechanisms. From inside the J. Harvey & A beneficial. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate personal relationships: Repair and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A great. D. (2000). Projection yourself impression one of spouses once the a purpose of the fresh resemblance within mutual enjoy. Identity And you can Personal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience off extrinsic rewards towards the preference and enjoying. Journal regarding Identity and you may Social Psychology, 38(3), www.datingmentor.org/escort/davie/ 453–460.

العربيةEnglishFrançaisעִבְרִיתEspañol
error: Content is protected © Copyright Mega Builders Cop. !!